2.1 As touched on above, KPIs are not an end in themselves but need to be used to help identify changes or to add weight to continuing a course of action. Who considers the KPIs will vary from organisation to organisation, but if your senior managers have been involved in preparing the employer brand it is a reasonable expectation to report back on how things are going. When monitoring, some areas to consider are:
Be realistic about timing. Some aspects of the brand will show results relatively early. This is particularly true for internal awareness. If you have communications right, there should be knowledge about the brand around its launch. Changing perceptions of an external market may take far longer.
Stay with it; not only will some audiences be harder to reach but others may lose key messages if they are not repeated or are not experienced by staff on a day to day basis. The effectiveness of the brand may be whether in six months or a year post-launch, people cannot recognise or only have a vague memory of. Monitoring needs therefore to be ongoing.
Being clear to decision makers what the information is saying. If an organisation is committed to ‘enhancing careers’ you should see an increase in job applications from a younger demographic; the strength of the brand will be enhanced if this outcome is seen across all advertisements rather than simply the annual apprenticeship programme. Do not jump to conclusions based on the immediacy of evidence just to support the concept of the brand.
When to ask decision makers for help and being clear what this means for them. Using the above example, if staff survey information suggests the organisation is not committed to career development there may be problems in a particular area; find out and present the problem and work with other HR/management colleagues to suggest solutions.
Adjust your brand strategy based on what is working. Looking at social media to reflect on what has earned the most views, likes, shares and comments. Do not forget to learn from what communication has not done so well. Is it the language that is being used, or method of communication, or even doubts about the authenticity?
It is unlikely that an organisation will launch an inauthentic brand if it has followed a systematic approach to brand development, including testing out attributes with a broad range of staff and ideally external audiences. The quality and longevity of the brand will however be enhanced if there is a willingness to tweak its content and challenge how its communicated. Both with ensure that investment has been worth-while and the brand is sustainable.
6.3 When to Act
3.1 If the KPIs are indicating outcomes that are at odds with the intended targets; investigate the causes and take appropriate action. There are, however, other occasions when it is important to reconsider the brand, distinct from the KPIs. In a very few cases this may require a refresh but, more frequently, demand recognition that things have changed and an explanation how this impacts on the brand attributes.
3.2 Some examples when action is required include:
When an organisation merges with another; this may be in any sector; including where there is a new acquisition.
Where the type of services or product that is being delivered changes leading to alterations in the workforce make-up.
Significant changes in the senior management team; where it is recognised that the new cadre bring different priorities which impact on the culture of the organisation.
There are external events that may damage brand attributes or put delivery at risk. For example, a downturn in the economy may undermine an organisation’s commitment to offer a ‘job for life’. Tracking external analytics is important to ensure the weight of external changes.
Another organisation emerges as a competitor for precious staff resources. On such occasions it may be necessary to challenge the attractiveness of the brand or how it is communicated.
3.3 Putting aside any events described above, it is good practice to review the authenticity and reach of the brand on a regular and structured basis. For a few organisations, brand attributes will become to viewed as part of its DNA, but for most there is a need to review, tweak and refresh. In these ways, the employer brand will remain a powerful tool that enhances organisational effectiveness over the longer term.
6.4 Time to Reflect
4.1 You cannot manage what you do not measure is an old management adage that remains accurate. Unless you measure something, you don’t know if it is getting better or worse. Whilst there are challenges in measuring the success of the brand we have suggested KPIs that could be used and occasions when there is a need to actively review the brand. Thinking about your own organisation:
Identify three KPIs that could be used to measure your brand.
How frequently would the KPIs be considered?
Who would you consider the KPIs and what authority would they have to act?
4.2 This complete our journey on the development, communication and monitoring of an employer brand. We hope that you have enjoyed reading this short book and feel able to confidently tackle its introduction or review; whatever the size of your organisation. Have fun!